Reviewing the blueness of some blue states
Three new polls, all from very Democratic states, all must-win states for the Democratic nominee. If he or she loses California, there is no possible way they will get to 270 electoral votes. And while they can do the math without MA and MD, losing there means they're losing everywhere else. Thankfully for them, Hillary is untouchable in both MA and CA (so much of Rudy's claim that he will make California very competitive), though Maryland appears more competitive than usual. Let's review.
As I already mentioned, California is one of those blue states Rudy likes to argue he would make competitive. A New York poll a few days ago proved he would have no chance whatsoever there. At least he is much closer here... but 16% in California is very hard to move given how expensive the state is, so Rudy is very unlikely to try anything there, just as Bush stayed (mostly) away.
- Massachusetts
- California
As I already mentioned, California is one of those blue states Rudy likes to argue he would make competitive. A New York poll a few days ago proved he would have no chance whatsoever there. At least he is much closer here... but 16% in California is very hard to move given how expensive the state is, so Rudy is very unlikely to try anything there, just as Bush stayed (mostly) away.
- Maryland
3 Comments:
It is no way that anyone who watched the debate as an "undecided" voter would walk away saying "I will vote for Hillary". That notion is ridiculous. I am at this point undecided but Hillary is close to being out of the running in my mind as well as the others who attended the debate party I was at. It is less than 3 months to the primary, she is supposed to be asked tough questions. And a good candidate would be able to answer the questions clearly and the audience would walk away like "whoa" they asked tough questions but she answered them very well. Hillary did the opposite. She went back and forth in her answers, flip-flopping. And I think the thing that really turned me off from her is playing the "victim". If a man did the same thing, no way no one would buy it. All debates ask more and tougher questions to the perceived frontrunner, b/c due to their status it is clear that the people are more interested in them.
I also see many people defending her elusive response on the issue of illegal immigrants, saying it is a complex issue. Most are, but if someone ask you do you support a "specific" bill, not a "hypothetical" bill,then you should be able to say a simple "Yes" or "No". You can say, "yes, b/c ..." or "No, b/c...." but she didn't take a stance on it one way or another. That is troubling. I cannot vote for her.
By Anonymous, At 01 November, 2007 11:14
Not sure if you caught the debate, if you want to read a brief commentary from Fox news, check it out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8ocKiHEzvM
By Anonymous, At 01 November, 2007 11:15
(also posted at Politics 1)
Hillary, or any other Democrat, will likely win Maryland by better than five points, and probably by double digits (maybe high single digits if she faces Rudy, and that's being optimistic for the GOP side.)
MD is a difficult state to poll, because you have to get the right balance of the differing regions of the state. Calling randomly around the state doesn't always produce good results; they may have underpolled the DC suburbs and Baltimore City (maybe a lot of Montgomery and Prince George's voters were stuck in traffic?)
If you flash back to last year, the polls showed Ehrlich at least even with O'Malley, and Republicans were slobbering over Michael Steele's alleged chances at picking up a Senate seat. Instead O'Malley beat Ehrlich by 6 points, and Ben Cardin trounced Steele by 11. In both cases the Democrats did much better on Election Day than in the polls.
Also, the poll was conducted in only one day, which is somewhat questionable, and I'm pretty sure that 9% of Maryland voters are not going to vote third party (for who?) Sorry, but Rasmussen probably fell on its face with this one.
By Anonymous, At 01 November, 2007 12:23
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home