Lieberman takes one more step towards the Republican Party
4 years after Sen. Zell Miller gave the keynote speech at the 2004 Republican Convention, another Senator who caucuses for Democrats is looking to have his moment of glory on the GOP stage. Joe Lieberman is now telling reporters that he would address the Republican delegates in Minnesota if John McCain asked him to do so. Some are already mentioning the possibility of keynote speaker Lieberman.
The Arizona Senator has not done so for now, but Lieberman and McCain have been traveling together extensively over the past few months; Lieberman accompanied McCain on his European and Middle-eastern trip earlier this year.
McCain's choice to associate this closely with Lieberman has been somewhat puzzling, especially when McCain was still battling for the Republican nomination. Whatever credit and bi-partisan appeal Lieberman's support might grant McCain, Lieberman is also remembered by Republican voters as the Democrats' vice-presidential nominee in 2000, one of the two men against which conservatives mobilized in Florida and beyond (the days of "Sore-Loserman").
It was one thing for Republicans to cheer Zell Miller, a very conservative Senator from Georgia; it will be quite a sight to watch them stand up to applaud Joe Lieberman. In Florida, where McCain traveled extensively with Lieberman, Mitt Romney blasted McCain for being insufficiently conservative, using his association with the Connecticut Senator as Exhibit A.
Many conservatives still feel a deep distrust for John McCain, even if he appears to have solidified the Republican base around him since he wrapped up the nomination. This is not exactly the same situation as George Bush in 2004, then, where the incumbent president had solid support among conservatives but very limited appeal to Democrats and independents. So what would McCain gain by putting at the center of his celebratory convention someone like Lieberman who, however much he has become a reliable Rightist voice on national security and foreign affairs, still generally votes Democratic on social issues?
Two thoughts come to mind: (1) McCain wants to run this election on national security and, for some reason, he believes that he would have an advantage if he ran on Iraq. By highlighting Joe Lieberman's support, he calls for voters to put to the side economic and social issues (on which Lieberman and McCain don't necessarily see eye to eye) and vote on national security and on character -- the two issues Republicans feel McCain has an edge on and the two issues Lieberman is supposedly touting.
(2) There is nothing more satisfactory than to see someone from the opposite party bash his party's own candidate. Zell Miller's absurdly hateful speech in 2004 had to be such a great moment for Republicans; and considering the type of comments Joe Lieberman is already directing at Barack Obama, we can expect that he will spend the next few months hitting the Illinois Senator. Asked whether he thought Obama was a Marxist, he recently said, as reported by the Huffington Post:
Prepare for Republicans to use comments like this one to demonstrate Obama's being too far to the Left; what will be lost is the irony of Obama having endorsed Joe Lieberman in his primary against Ned Lamont in 2006...
The Arizona Senator has not done so for now, but Lieberman and McCain have been traveling together extensively over the past few months; Lieberman accompanied McCain on his European and Middle-eastern trip earlier this year.
McCain's choice to associate this closely with Lieberman has been somewhat puzzling, especially when McCain was still battling for the Republican nomination. Whatever credit and bi-partisan appeal Lieberman's support might grant McCain, Lieberman is also remembered by Republican voters as the Democrats' vice-presidential nominee in 2000, one of the two men against which conservatives mobilized in Florida and beyond (the days of "Sore-Loserman").
It was one thing for Republicans to cheer Zell Miller, a very conservative Senator from Georgia; it will be quite a sight to watch them stand up to applaud Joe Lieberman. In Florida, where McCain traveled extensively with Lieberman, Mitt Romney blasted McCain for being insufficiently conservative, using his association with the Connecticut Senator as Exhibit A.
Many conservatives still feel a deep distrust for John McCain, even if he appears to have solidified the Republican base around him since he wrapped up the nomination. This is not exactly the same situation as George Bush in 2004, then, where the incumbent president had solid support among conservatives but very limited appeal to Democrats and independents. So what would McCain gain by putting at the center of his celebratory convention someone like Lieberman who, however much he has become a reliable Rightist voice on national security and foreign affairs, still generally votes Democratic on social issues?
Two thoughts come to mind: (1) McCain wants to run this election on national security and, for some reason, he believes that he would have an advantage if he ran on Iraq. By highlighting Joe Lieberman's support, he calls for voters to put to the side economic and social issues (on which Lieberman and McCain don't necessarily see eye to eye) and vote on national security and on character -- the two issues Republicans feel McCain has an edge on and the two issues Lieberman is supposedly touting.
(2) There is nothing more satisfactory than to see someone from the opposite party bash his party's own candidate. Zell Miller's absurdly hateful speech in 2004 had to be such a great moment for Republicans; and considering the type of comments Joe Lieberman is already directing at Barack Obama, we can expect that he will spend the next few months hitting the Illinois Senator. Asked whether he thought Obama was a Marxist, he recently said, as reported by the Huffington Post:
I must say, that's a good question... I will tell you that during this campaign, I've learned some things about him, about the kind of environment from which he came ideologically. And I wouldn't...I'd hesitate to say he's a Marxist, but he's got some positions that are far to the left of me and I think mainstream America.
Prepare for Republicans to use comments like this one to demonstrate Obama's being too far to the Left; what will be lost is the irony of Obama having endorsed Joe Lieberman in his primary against Ned Lamont in 2006...
Labels: Lieberman
13 Comments:
I think is pretty obvious what Lieberman want to do, he is aiming to be McCain Sec Def, he knows that this November Democrats are going to expand their majority and Lieberman will no longer be necessary if McCain doesn't win you can expect Lieberman to either chance party or lose his Committee Assignment and ranking
By Unknown, At 16 April, 2008 17:52
Picking Leiberman as VP was a terrible mistake. His allegiance is with Israel. If Barack is nominated,there's one more voting block to go red. McCain's family tree will help with that.
By Anonymous, At 16 April, 2008 17:52
If Lieberman speaks at the the GOP convention then the liberal push to kick him out of the Democratic majority will be too much for Reid to overcome. Especially since it looks like that (1 The democrats will almost certainly gain at least 2 seats, if not more, and (2 the chances of dems getting a 60 vote majority including Liberman is extremely unlikely. Therefore I think it is highly likely that in 2009 Liberman will lose his senority and chairmanship within the Democratic caucus and he will be forced to caucus with Republicans. If this doesn't happen and Lieberman decided to remain caucusing with democrats, the McCain endorsement will be enough to make democrats mount a strong challange to Lieberman in 2012. The most recent poll I've seen shows Lieberman being less popular than Chris Dodd, and this comes from abmysal rating from democrats and only lukewarm support from independents.
By Anonymous, At 16 April, 2008 17:53
I cant wait when we no longer need Lieberman
By Anonymous, At 16 April, 2008 17:56
I agree with you brad. I'm not partically upset with him being a foreign policy hawk, but when he endorsed John McCain that was the last straw. I hope Reid kicks him out of the caucus in 2009 after Democrats win the seats necessary to have an majority without him.
By Anonymous, At 16 April, 2008 18:41
"Picking Leiberman as VP was a terrible mistake. His allegiance is with Israel. If Barack is nominated,there's one more voting block to go red. McCain's family tree will help with that."
Now, what the hell kind of stupid comment was that.
I am a white, male jew and I am voting for Obama.
Lieberman's allegiance is to the United States of America - always has been - and when I hear scum like you drag out anti-semitic shit like this, I can only hope and pray that you do not belong to the democratic party, for the like of you WE DO NOT NEED.
By Statistikhengst, At 16 April, 2008 19:58
I don't think Lieberman is bad for the Democratic Party. Remember, the Democrats used to be famous for having a large tent. We used to have liberals, militants, minorities, Catholics, conservative Southernors, and unions. We have now gotten rid of almost all of the conservatives from the party, and now we are aiming to purge the moderates like Lieberman out. Joe is ok.
By Anonymous, At 16 April, 2008 20:38
Mark,
Dude, like calm down. You are reading into the guy's posting too much. The guy stated a true fact--Joe Lieberman is pro-Israel. I disagree that he was a bad pick for VP, but if that's what the guy feels, more power to him!
By Anonymous, At 16 April, 2008 21:21
Mark you are a bigot.
By Anonymous, At 16 April, 2008 22:06
You Obamans have my sympathy. Barack resembled the public defender in "My Cousin Vinny" tonight. Did he have oral surgery today or just a few too many shots?
By Anonymous, At 16 April, 2008 22:09
The problem with Lieberman isn't that he's a "moderate." The problem is that he isn't really a Democrat anymore. Nor is he really representing his state; there's a poll from last September that says Lamont would beat Lieberman in a rematch.
And he has been bad for the party. The party ran on doing something about the war. Lieberman has opposed changing course and fully supported Bush's Iraq agenda. He's free to do what he wants, and Democrats lacked the votes to get anything through the Senate even with Lieberman. But let's not pretend he's helped the party with his positions.
Would it be a surprise to see him switch parties in the next Congress? The Dems probably won't need him, and he'd be subject to a serious Democratic primary challenge next time around anyway. I would not be shocked.
By dsimon, At 17 April, 2008 15:15
jianbin1202
michael kors online outlet
wedding dresses
michael kors handbags
uggs on sale
ugg clearance
tods shoes
bottega veneta outlet online
uggs outlet
links of london uk
replica watches
nike shoes
arizona cardinals
mont blanc
lululemon outlet store
miami dolphins
basketball shoes
cleveland cavaliers
michael kors handbags,michael kors outlet,michael kors,kors outlet,michael kors outlet online,michael kors outlet online sale,michael kors handbags clearance,michael kors purses,michaelkors.com,michael kors bags,michael kors shoes,michaelkors,cheap michael kors
michael kors outlet online
salomon speedcross 3
abercrombie fitch
iphone cases
cheap oakley sunglasses
louis vuitton uk
nike huarache
woolrich clothing
celine outlet online
ralph lauren,ralph lauren uk,ralph lauren outlet,ralph lauren outlet online,polo ralph lauren outlet,ralph lauren polo
oakley outlet online
tory burch sandals
indianapolis colts
soccer jerseys,cheap soccer jerseys,cheap soccer jerseys for sale,soccer jersey,usa soccer jersey,football jerseys
ugg boots
By 艾丰, At 01 December, 2015 22:06
Finally I've found something which helped me. Thank you
http://www.prokr.net/2016/09/ceramic-polishing-companies-4.html
http://www.prokr.net/2016/09/ceramic-polishing-companies-3.html
By Unknown, At 08 August, 2017 07:30
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home