How important is Florida's Democratic primary?
Hillary Clinton is doing what she can to make Florida matter. She is holding a rally tonight in Florida after the polls close (well at 7pm, so an hour before). The pledge forbids pre-election campaigning, but says nothing about celebrating results in the state. That also probably means that she will deliver a victory speech tonight, and the networks will probably cover it since they will be on air anyway covering the GOP race. The Clinton campaign also organized a conference call today to push coverage of Florida. Howard Wolfson, for example, emphasized that it was, "heartening and extraordinary to see record numbers of people coming out and saying that their preferences and their voices and their choices matter."
The Obama camp has been trying to dismiss Florida for weeks, arguing that the primary here is a beauty contest with no delegates. And they rolled out John Kerry today to argue against the Clinton spin: "As voters look to the meaning of the Florida primary, they’re not looking of this kind of tactic." But how much does it matter that the state has no delegates? The odds of the convention being brokered are still extremely low, for they requires results to stay close until the summer and John Edwards to get a lot of delegates. While delegates will not be added tonight, the winner of a primary contest is usually determined by how manages expectations and the flow of momentum the best. And until we get a better indication that delegates will matter, the fact of the matter is that Florida will be a welcome break after a few days of (very) bad news for the Clinton campaign.
If the importance of Florida is momentum rather than delegates, the question is whether Super Tuesday voters care about Florida not having delegates? And will they even know that it does not and will they understand why that could matter (which I am not even sure it does until we know that the convention is brokered)? Or will they just tune in to see that Clinton has won in one of the biggest states in the country against the entire field -- unlike Michigan?
The answers to these questions are very much up in the air. We don't know what impact Florida might have, and it depends on three things:
Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton got some more good news by grabbing an endorsement by Maxine Waters, an African-American representative from California who is considered one of the more left-of-center congresswoman in DC. Considering the building perception that Hillary is sinking among black voters and that nearly everyone who is endorsing over the past 3-4 days is going for Barack, this at least provides some comfort to the Clintons.
And Obama has received the endorsement of Kansas Governor Sibelius, who could be a big help in February 5th. I already covered and analyzed this on Sunday, when the first reports had emerged, but the media appears to be really covering it only now. Obama's goal on Super Tuesday is to do well in the interior states to hit Clinton's inability to win away from the coasts, so doing well in Kansas is an important part of his strategy.
The Obama camp has been trying to dismiss Florida for weeks, arguing that the primary here is a beauty contest with no delegates. And they rolled out John Kerry today to argue against the Clinton spin: "As voters look to the meaning of the Florida primary, they’re not looking of this kind of tactic." But how much does it matter that the state has no delegates? The odds of the convention being brokered are still extremely low, for they requires results to stay close until the summer and John Edwards to get a lot of delegates. While delegates will not be added tonight, the winner of a primary contest is usually determined by how manages expectations and the flow of momentum the best. And until we get a better indication that delegates will matter, the fact of the matter is that Florida will be a welcome break after a few days of (very) bad news for the Clinton campaign.
If the importance of Florida is momentum rather than delegates, the question is whether Super Tuesday voters care about Florida not having delegates? And will they even know that it does not and will they understand why that could matter (which I am not even sure it does until we know that the convention is brokered)? Or will they just tune in to see that Clinton has won in one of the biggest states in the country against the entire field -- unlike Michigan?
The answers to these questions are very much up in the air. We don't know what impact Florida might have, and it depends on three things:
- Margin: How much does Clinton win by? If she gets a big victory -- crossing 50% -- it is hard to ignore the fact that a majority of voters went for her. After all, her rival campaigns like to point out that most of the party is anti-Clinton. On the other hand, if Barack manages to keep it close it will serve as more evidence that Clinton is going down rapidly and that the Kennedy endorsement is playing out big in Obama's favor.
- Turnout: How many voters go to the polls? Most estimations are that it will be more than a million, and remember that there is a controversial initiative on the ballot today on property taxes that has attracted a lot of spending and that could drive up turnout.
- Media coverage: This is obviously the big question. Will the networks tonight and the press tomorrow cover this primary? This is where it gets tricky. It obviously depends on turnout and margins, but there is no question that the Democratic primary will be massively overshadowed by the GOP contest given how huge that one is. But that also means that the Democratic primary will get some coverage no matter what and if Clinton delivers a speech tonight it is likely to be covered.
Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton got some more good news by grabbing an endorsement by Maxine Waters, an African-American representative from California who is considered one of the more left-of-center congresswoman in DC. Considering the building perception that Hillary is sinking among black voters and that nearly everyone who is endorsing over the past 3-4 days is going for Barack, this at least provides some comfort to the Clintons.
And Obama has received the endorsement of Kansas Governor Sibelius, who could be a big help in February 5th. I already covered and analyzed this on Sunday, when the first reports had emerged, but the media appears to be really covering it only now. Obama's goal on Super Tuesday is to do well in the interior states to hit Clinton's inability to win away from the coasts, so doing well in Kansas is an important part of his strategy.
Labels: FL-Dem
6 Comments:
It is so interesting to see the difference in the coverage that the networks have given the democratic returns in Florida. CNN reported the returns, reporting that Hillary won at the same time indicating that no delegates were awarded. MSNBC true to their slant covering Hillary did not even report the returns, just a line indicating that she got “the most votes”, and FOX, well nobody cares what FOX says outside of the membership of the Flat Earth society! Chris Mathews was his usual insane self, looking for any angle to attack Hillary, while Olbermann is slowly but surely becoming a caricature. I hate that because I like him a lot. I just think that the pundits are missing the boat with this vote. The MSNBC cabal is making the argument that Hillary’s lead was built by the absentee and early voters. According to their exit polls Obama matched Hillary vote by among those that made their decision and voted during the last month. Still, among those that voted today, Hillary’s won. MSNBC argument implies that the vote is not representative because those that voted earlier could have changed their vote. That is a facetious argument. Early voters are usually the most committed and certain of their vote, not likely to change. The voting patter was also confirmed by the polls taken up to the election day. Had the polls registered a surge for Obama, and the vote a big victory for Clinton, then an argument could be made for “voters buyers remorse.” The statistic do not bare that conclusion.
By Anonymous, At 29 January, 2008 23:42
Robert, enough with the "biased against liberals" theory. Hasn't it become obvious that the networks would love nothing more that to see four viable candidates, two in each party, all the way to the conventions? It would be more newsworthy that way. Hence MSNBC's insistence that McCain could never get conservatives in the general election. And FOX gave an interview to Sen. Clinton in addition to airing the bulk of her speech, so it wasn't as if they failed to cover your party this evening. (Also, apparently I'm a member of the Flat Earth Society. I hope there aren't any dues...if so, I'm somewhat in arrears.)
By Anonymous, At 30 January, 2008 02:30
Mr. Rational: Not my party, not the Dems, and I have not said anything about ""biased against liberals". My fire is mostly against MSNBC because I believe that they have made a conscious decision to favor Barack Obama in the coverage. Perhaps nobody is watching them, but the real benefit for cables news coverage is mostly seen in the "water cooler effect", when folks get together and move alone tidbits of information. Same effect as Drudge, but in a smaller scale. MSNBC does have an institutional bias. But please do not allow FOX off the hook. If you cannot see the slant there, then you are not as rational as I thought you were. Still what I like of FOX is that they seem to be unapologetic about what they do, and love to get under the skin of the crazy left with their “Fair and Balance” slogan. All this organizations have institutional biases, and I for once believe that there is not a real problem with that, since they reflect the general population feelings about issues. Ass long as anybody gets a shake in the process, and there seems to be ample room for everybody here.
By Anonymous, At 30 January, 2008 08:06
There's no doubt that Senator Clinton has always had the advantage of name recognition and that's the main factor at work in the Florida results and her lead in national polls. Clinton would love it if the race would end tomorrow because it seems she's ahead although the national polls are gradually shifting in Obama's favor. We'll see if Obama is able to create enough positive news to make it an even race by February 5th. The next debate will be big as well as endorsements. The Edwards withdrawal probably helps Obama more than Clinton because the people who voted Edwards already made a decision that they didn't want to see a Clinton nomination. I've noticed that Clinton supporters are throwing the kitchen sink at Obama right now. They're feeling back in a corner. Hold on to your hats... it'll be a bumpy ride.
By Anonymous, At 30 January, 2008 11:09
louis vuitton, prada handbags, kate spade outlet, ray ban sunglasses, nike air max, jordan shoes, nike outlet, michael kors outlet, ray ban sunglasses, longchamp outlet, longchamp outlet, longchamp, tiffany jewelry, cheap oakley sunglasses, replica watches, oakley sunglasses, tory burch outlet, tiffany and co, oakley sunglasses, ugg boots, louis vuitton outlet, ray ban sunglasses, ugg boots, replica watches, louboutin outlet, louboutin shoes, michael kors outlet, nike air max, burberry, nike free, chanel handbags, ugg boots, ugg boots, michael kors outlet, christian louboutin outlet, polo ralph lauren outlet, louis vuitton, polo ralph lauren outlet, michael kors outlet, oakley sunglasses, uggs on sale, michael kors, louis vuitton outlet, louboutin, gucci outlet, oakley sunglasses
By oakleyses, At 15 November, 2015 21:23
marc jacobs, doudoune canada goose, ugg,uggs,uggs canada, moncler, canada goose outlet, moncler, vans, converse, ugg,ugg australia,ugg italia, moncler, hollister, ugg boots uk, barbour jackets, gucci, bottes ugg, louis vuitton, michael kors outlet online, michael kors outlet, lancel, canada goose outlet, converse outlet, canada goose, pandora charms, barbour, canada goose, links of london, pandora jewelry, moncler outlet, coach outlet, moncler, pandora charms, replica watches, louis vuitton, canada goose, louis vuitton, nike air max, hollister, moncler, pandora jewelry, michael kors handbags, wedding dresses, ugg pas cher, swarovski, karen millen, juicy couture outlet, doke gabbana outlet, montre pas cher, canada goose uk, moncler, toms shoes, louis vuitton, ray ban
By oakleyses, At 15 November, 2015 21:39
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home